The given diagram illustrates that amount of Southland's principal exports in 2000, 2021 and future plans for 2025
The given diagram illustrates that amount of Southland's principal exports in 2000, 2021 and future plans for 2025.
Overall, rate of international tourism will be taken high position in plan of 2025 and now amount of dairy products evelate their level in 2021. Both of these can achieve rising to summit in the given years respectively.
One of the first thing to note is that, the number of international tourism and dairy products is looked more than meat products. In 2025, international tourism's amount will be grown than other two products and also that time, too dairy products will be taken high position so both of them will indicate 10 and 9,5 billions respectively. In additional to that, international tourism and dairy products are increasing these days and their number shows 9 and 10 accordingly.
Another thing which stands out in this chart is that, in 2000, amount of exports of the given three years did not achieve big level and number of them could not take high position so they displayed number which did not increase from 8 billion. Moreover, rate of meat products can not rise in the given three years and number of them are not seen differently so almost equal each other.
- The diagrams explain the ways and devices in which the two types of materials are manufactured for the purpose of construction
- The line graph illustrates the number of visitors came to a particular island of Caribbean from 2010 to 2017 67
- Similarities among nations are now common as citizens have equal opportunities such as worldwide consumptions To my mind even though purchasing all types of products from every part of the world brings about negative effects including loss of cultures and 56
- The two pie charts illustrate the developments in the production of different types of grains in NWFP which have happened from 1990 to 2020
- Some people think that the purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of exports of the given three years did not achieve big level and number of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, look, moreover, so, another thing, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83009708738 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56643741384 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7518843864 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268783145452 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172338653527 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.31624978068 0.0843802449381 375% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318976750258 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.395688293081 0.0819641961636 483% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.