The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990

Essay topics:

The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.

The line graphs compare the expenditure of fast food every weekly in the UK between 1970 and 1990.

It is clearly from the graph that the amount of Fish & Chips experienced the most change during this period. While the quantities of Hamburger and Fish & Chips both increased significantly, there was a slightly decrease in the figure for Pizza.

In 1970, the quantities of Pizza consumed were highest at more than 300 grams while the figure for Hamburger was by far lowest only at 30 grams. Meanwhile, about 80 grams for Fish & Chips were expenditured in the UK. The year 1980 saw a small decrease in the amount of Pizza consumed at around 200 grams, while the figure for Hamburger and Fish & Chips rose gradually to approximately 100 grams and 150 grams respectively.

In 1990, Fish & Chips weekly consumption went up dramatically to 500 grams and became the highest figure in the line graph while Hamburger’s figure increased slightly to about 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of Pizza eaten remained stable at around 200 grams.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (69 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-18 Arshdeepmondair 78 view
2021-07-26 rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com 87 view
2019-04-22 joystick 84 view
2018-05-15 Phuong Vy 73 view
2017-04-08 Fnweakly 33 view
Essays by user Thu Ngo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eekly in the UK between 1970 and 1990. It is clearly from the graph that the am...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...both increased significantly, there was a slightly decrease in the figure for Pizza. In 1970, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92655367232 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72064033464 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1627555503 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153074645137 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089547743613 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130698059834 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150792810552 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154476288286 0.0819641961636 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.