The line graph illustrates about the amount of three types of fast food consumed in the UK on a weekly basis during a 20 years period from 1970.
Overall, it is clear that there were downward trends of the consumptions of fish/chips and hamburger. By contrast, pizza became the least pleasurable food.
In 1970, the quantity of pizza eaten was highest at 300 grams. Around 100 grams was the amount of fish/chip consumed, while the figure for hamburger was lower slightly at approximately 25 grams.
From 1970 to 1990, the consumptions of fish/chips and hamburger gradually increased before rising sharply to 500 grams and about 300 grams respectively. By contrast, there was a dramatic decrease in pizza until the year of 1980 then remaining stable.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Thu Ngo
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation? Discuss both view and give your opinion? 56
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 61
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 56
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slightly at approximately 25 grams. From 1970 to 1990, the consumptions of f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 636.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 125.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.088 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76973356119 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 175.5 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9273643648 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216243973451 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891560205841 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10063693727 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133023808477 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10619525803 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.