Consumption of the fast food in the UK.
The given line graph illustrates the weekly consumption of three different junk foods in the Britain between 1970 and 1990. Discussing the amount of hamburger, it was started from nearly 40 grams at starting in 1970 and in 1985, these value was reached at more than 100 grams with a minimal surge. Eventually, there was a rapid rise was observed at the and and crossed the pizza in 1990 with 200 grams.
In first 10 years, the consumption of Fish and Chips was gradually increased from about 90 grams to 150 grams. A sudden climb recorded in the consumption from 1940 to 1990 and reached at all time high by the value of 500 grams. however a maximum consumption of pizza was noticed at starting(300 grams), it was at the lowest at the end of 1990(200 grams). After having a decline, in 1985, the consumption rose slightly and reached nearly 200 grams in 1990.
Overall, an upward trend was seen in Hamburger and Fish & Chips while Pizza experienced a downward tendency.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 11
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 73
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Consumption of the fast food in the UK. The given line graph illustrates the wee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in the Britain between 1970 and 1990. Discussing the amount of hamburger, it w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...re was a rapid rise was observed at the and and crossed the pizza in 1990 with 200 gram...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ossed the pizza in 1990 with 200 grams. In first 10 years, the consumption of Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll time high by the value of 500 grams. however a maximum consumption of pizza w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... however a maximum consumption of pizza was noti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
... however a maximum consumption of pizza was noti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63687150838 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54723282441 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4828539767 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241373084858 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138474537211 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151090028697 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196373569005 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163951223694 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.