The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph compares the quantity of fast food weekly eaten by the individual of the UK from 1970 to 1990.
It is clear that the amount of Fish & chips consumed per week was a dramatic increase during the research period. Additionally, while the quantities of Hamburger and Fish & chips were both grow significantly, there was a slow decrease in the figure for pizza.
In 1970, the quantity of Pizza consumed was highest, around 300 grams, while the figure for fish & chips was significant slowly, approximately 80 grams. At the same time, there were about 30 grams the Hamburger eaten by the UK people. In 1980, the consumption of the Pizza was slightly drop but still remained highest, at more than 200 grams per week.
In 1990, the amount of Fish & Chips consumption was increased significantly to 500 grams and became the highest figure in the graph, while the figure for Pizza was insignificantly fell to over 200 grams. Meanwhile, Hamburger weekly consumption slight grew to around 300 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1995 and 2002, and projections for 2050 67
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity? 61
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are causes And what will be effected on society 86
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh & chips were both grow significantly, there was a slow decrease in the figure ...
^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
...e consumption of the Pizza was slightly drop but still remained highest, at more tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99408284024 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74989026842 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4841740448 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225165593161 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120120506744 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139427056128 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190665765763 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166279502826 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.