The given line graph demonstrates how much pizza, hamburgers, and fish & chips are eaten every week in the United Kingdom within a 20-year period, starting from 1970.
Overall, the consumption of the three varieties collectively experienced an upward trend during the time frame, except for that of fish & chips. Moreover, the most dramatic alteration can be seen in the figure for hamburgers.
In the year 1970, the amount of fish & chips consumed weekly was highest, at 300 grams, which was threefold that of hamburgers (approximately 100 grams). Meanwhile, nearly 50 grams of pizza was eaten per week. Until 1985, the weekly consumption of fish & chips slightly declined and reached its bottom of 200 grams, whereas there were gradual increases in the other two figures.
In 1990, the data for hamburgers witnessed a remarkable rise to 500 grams and became the highest figure in the chart. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, can be seen in the amount of pizza eaten, which grew to 300 grams. By contrast, there was no significant change in the quantity of fish & chips consumed on a weekly basis, at roughly 200 grams.
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the world 11
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What solutions can you suggest 89
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
Bạn ơi, ko biết là do ảnh…
Bạn ơi, ko biết là do ảnh của tui bị sai hay sao á. Mà sao ảnh của tui thì tui thấy fish and chips nó dẫn đầu số liệu vào năm 1990 mà nhỉ??:)) Bạn còn giũ hình thì cho tui xin nha
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98936170213 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63952897523 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3127702599 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156357678594 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608438950817 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543605553941 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950859790678 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624289262031 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.