The line graphs below compare the weekly consumption of 3 different types of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
It is obvious that the 3 lines have many oscillations. 2 out of 3 lines all increased significantly except for the pizza line.
In 1970, fish and chips had a starting line very low than pizza. The number of crispy fish and fried started at only 90 grams per week. While pizza was the highest in the line graph at around 300 grams consumed every week. Until 1990,over 200 grams each week demonstrated that pizza was no longer the most favorite food in the UK. The most surprising change is fish and chips. This fast food took the lead at 500 grams weekly in 1990.
At first, hamburgers were the same as fried fish and potatoes but lower level of 4 grams by the week. The passage of time, hamburgers also rose stable. Its consumption showed a gradual increase trend till 1990 when reached 390 grams. The output of fish and chips, hamburgers and pizza respectively.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- Money Spent on Books 73
- Average annual spending on mobile phones domestic and international fixed services 2001 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ried started at only 90 grams per week. While pizza was the highest in the line graph...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52247191011 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40373951188 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6114149106 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.9230769231 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6923076923 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31516772932 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104150441621 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143788550848 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215386063348 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201898582736 0.0819641961636 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.34 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.