Money Spent on Books
The line graph below compares how much money spent on books by different countries from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, the trend of all countries is upward. It is predict that the number of reading books in all countries will rise up. This is a good signal for people in approaching to knowledge.
As can be seen from the line graph, the number of money in Germany went up to 10 million from 1995-1999, while Italy also increased slightly 5 millions but in 1999 this country returned to the original position one more time. After that there was a unstable change in the number of money in Germany and Italy. Between 1999 and 2003, German who spent money on reading books was have a decreased slightly approximately 5 million. By contrast, the money output of Italy climbed significantly over 10 million. And then until 2005, both countries still rose as well.
France and Australia increased gradually for 10 years. The number of money in France rose steadily in the period of 10 years, and reached a peak at 2005 with 75 million. Lastly, Australia had a giant leap when grew up enormously over 40 million since 1999. And the admirable thing is both countries did not have indicated decline during the progress. Although the money in reading books by 4 countries were climbed, but Germany still take the lead with 95 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | view | |
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- Money Spent on Books 73
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Percentage of people going to the cinema in a European country on different days 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
Comments
I’m so sorry bc I think this…
I’m so sorry bc I think this test will reply in the next few days:(( But can you give me an answer to this sentence:
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... a who spent money on reading books was have a decreased slightly approximately…
Why I should use “had” instead of “was have”
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares how much money spent on ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'predicted'.
Suggestion: predicted
...trend of all countries is upward. It is predict that the number of reading books in all...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion one more time. After that there was a unstable change in the number of money ...
^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...an who spent money on reading books was have a decreased slightly approximately 5 mi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, still, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70815450644 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46390061502 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570815450644 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2132821607 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3571428571 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272899341569 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962165682579 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115857465769 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192311510846 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109518743927 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.