The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina, Indonesia, Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003, 2025 and 2050.
The table presents the figures for population among 4 countries as Argentina, Indonesia, Italia and Republic of Korea. The data is collected in 2003 and predicted in 2025, 2050.
It is clear that the population in Indonesia always takes the lead in any given years. There is a considerable development of people in Argentina, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, but except for Italian people.
As can be seen from this table, the figure for the population in Indonesia remarkably increases from commencing 238 million in 2003 to 312 million in 2005. Those people who are in Argentina start the period with only 34 million, is also the lowest population among 4 countries before being predicted to becoming the second biggest figure at the end of the given period (2050).
Featuring a notable change is that Italian people experienced a slight decrease from 54 million to 45 million over the course of 47 years. Another northworthy observation, the figure for Korean residents will have no change with 52 million in 2025 and 2050 after beginning at 48 million.
- The following maps show the changes that have taken place in Sydney International Airport since 1930 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- People are living longer Some people think that it causes big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and society in general Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life You should write at least 250 words 67
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today s life Others argue that history is a valuable source of information 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03977272727 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74143458516 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.889969648 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301704302419 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151989387952 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972344970293 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226028513905 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137205218043 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.