Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Fast and safe transportation system and improved communication are two important aspects of the development of a country. Every government wants its citizens to commute safely and faster while the trade and business also depends on a solid transportation system. Thus when the question arises whether a government should focus on improving its railways or roads, people seems like have divided opinions. I personally agree that a government should spend more money on railways system as it is better to develop the railway transpiration system than developing roads.
Fast of all railways offers safe commuting both for the citizens and traders. The numbers of road accidents and casualties road vehicles causes in many countries are far more than that of accidents in railway system. Thus investing more on a safe way of commuting is a much more prudent idea. Rails cause comparatively less environmental damage while the road vehicles are the main reason for increasing pollution around the world.
Second, rails can carry hundreds of people and several tones of goods while road transports can carry only a few people or fewer amounts of products at a time. Some shuttle trains are many times faster than that of private cars and public buses. Thus improved railways would save peoples’ valuable time every day. Thirdly, rail lines are usually away from the main cities and that is why some busy cities have no other alternatives than to improve their rail transportation system. Express trains can reduce the congestions in many cities and thus investing more money to improve the railways is the only possible solutions in cities where a large number of people live in.
In conclusion, I believe that a government, either in a developed or developing country, should invest on a safer, faster and more reliable transportation system and railways thus should always get priority over the roads
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shahzoda2003energiya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Chayacp | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Gingin | 78 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 54
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situations or surrounding than by society as a whole. 16
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecast.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...pends on a solid transportation system. Thus when the question arises whether a gove...
^^^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...a government should spend more money on railways system as it is better to develop the r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...only possible solutions in cities where a large number of people live in. In conclusion, I bel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.301204819277 0.268076937826 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.123493975904 0.116061578633 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0933734939759 0.0759168565197 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0722891566265 0.0366838410393 197% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0180722891566 0.0131127313244 138% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123493975904 0.155750635184 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0301204819277 0.0379272487307 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7922408115 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0120481927711 0.0210936926555 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10843373494 0.0948980150116 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0240963855422 0.00437022459523 551% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00903614457831 0.00967000014798 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1910.0 1161.00487805 165% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.9 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18122977346 5.90752243213 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73763899035 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398058252427 0.337110787985 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268608414239 0.247514529752 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194174757282 0.171178102325 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116504854369 0.112407865282 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7922408115 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.546246751206 99% => OK
Word variations: 56.2368981346 49.3433353143 114% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 8.93414634146 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0714285714 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8387583617 42.9750493124 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.428571429 135.714022679 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.689975730869 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 48.9322699954 47.7609492067 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.12676056338 2.94281807926 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131205889391 0.418131533498 31% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0959962166722 0.181151798455 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.073208897023 0.0850326197045 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.518632814254 0.706616315825 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170654531108 0.157042692854 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590502209649 0.228904883108 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657940161047 0.108899403657 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.280345804989 0.367819155151 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0584119268429 0.0812612215331 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101772270573 0.316326947829 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578379389551 0.0921553760075 63% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70731707317 270% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.16585365854 284% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 7.1512195122 182% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.