The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The line chart illustrates the global digital 3D screens in a period of 7 years namely 2005 to 2011, while the bar chart provides information about the world 3D cinema releases, which are live action and animation in 8 years from 2004 to 2012.
In general, both data had an upward trend during the years. The proportions of both data climbed noticeably in the following years after rising consistently during the first four. Animation was stably maintained from 2005 until 2008. Since 2008, live action films have begun to appear.
According to the line chart, the worldwide starting number of digital 3D screens was about 0. They increased steadily each year from 2005 to 2008, but starting in 2008, they grew rapidly, were reached more than 30000 in 2010. A slight increase was made between 2010 and 2011, peaking at about 38000 screens.
Furthermore, the bar chart makes it clear that the animation had data which was unchanged for the first 4years, then rapidly increased from 2009 to 2012, were peaking at about 25. Additionally, about half of the animation was live action when it began in 2008. Then, in 2012, it shot up to roughly 50, nearly doubling the number of animations.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, then, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4105839731 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3904628241 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129841836841 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046581599219 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626688637421 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863384986011 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653677045847 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.