The graph and pie chart below give information on in house training courses in a large financial company

The two given charts show the data relating to in-house courses in a large financial corporation.
As per the pie chart which illustrates the training hours per year in the mentioned courses, half of the total spent time of the training is dedicated to the technical area with 30 hours practising a week. Career development is the next area which accounts for a quarter of the total training time (about 15 hours per year), after that, interpersonal skill, health and safety respectively cost 10 and 5 hours per year in the training courses.
Turning to the second chart where the manager’s and secretary’s attitude toward the courses is surveyed. According to this chart, most of them believe that these courses are essential for their job with nearly 78-83% voted. A slight proportion of manager thinks that it is a good excuse for a change (63-65%), following with a similar pattern of attitude can be seen in case of net working’s usefulness (42% and 50%). Finally, a dramatically minor proportion of trainees’ attitude said that the courses are a waste of valuable time.
Overall, it is obvious that the financial company needs its employees to excel in technical and their career enhancement and most of the trainees find it worthy.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd most of the trainees find it worthy.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96172248804 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78648062196 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1189931316 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212073633339 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941469961918 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784540313555 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135271157651 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841636644717 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.