The graph and table below give information about four new painkilling drugs which have recently been tested on patients.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Both graph and tablet show the cost of four new painkilling drugs for a 24-tablet packet measured by pounds and the tested patients’ comment regarding the performance of the drugs divided into 3 types respectively.
£2.40, the most expensive price, is accounted for Herbelieve (Herbal painkillers) for the price list of new painkilling drugs. Not only Iburight but also Paradoks rank the second with roughly £0.65 cheaper than the aforementioned drug. The least expense is belonged to Aspirobeta which only spends £1.2 to purchase 1 packet drug.
Moving to the next data, majority of patients proclaim that Aspobreta and Hebelive need 20 minutes to give the effect, while the other drugs have 10-minute effect and less. Regarding the effectiveness, patients response only Herbelieve giving no very effective, while the others show the reverse. The aforesaid drug is claimed by 66% of test takers for less than 2 hours effect duration of the drug, and the three of others experience a bigger percentage vote for 4-hour-length effect and more.
Overview, although Herbelieve has the highest price of new painkilling drugs, each the new drug has own strengths and weaknesses based three categorize standing points.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-07 | Fachri040495 | 78 | view |
- Parents are often over anxious to teach their children to speak If children are slow developers parents will often allow psychologists and schools to intervene and give their children speech therapy Do you think children develop at different rates and so 68
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for travelling public in the US in 2009 89
- The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the charts below illustrate which is of 3 fast food restaurants are the most preferred amongs teenagers in Vietnam and Indonesia in 2017 and prediction for 2027 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 38
- thediagram below shows thestages in the food production chain of the United States.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where elevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40414507772 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84865735405 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647668393782 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7475672944 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155647391137 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666997234215 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343708671471 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098691352541 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249572271479 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.