The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
The line graph illustrates the amount of water spent on three different sectors in the world in a century from 1900 to 2000 whereas the table indicates water utilization in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the amount of water use in agriculture was the largest compared to the domestic use was the smallest. Water utilization for irrigated land was higher than Congo in the given year.
Looking more closely at the line graph, we can see that in 1990, the amount of water use for agriculture, industrial use and domestic use about 500 km³, 100 km³ and 50 km³ respectively. However, the needs use water for agriculture was increased dramatically reach almost 3,000 km³ in the end of the period. In comparison, the industrial use significantly less used (above 1,000 km³), followed by approximately 400 km³ water used for domestic use.
According to the table, in 2000 a Brazilian used 359 m³ compared to Congo only 8 m³ per person because of the population in Brazil outnumbered Congo with 176 million and 5,2 million respectively. As a result, Brazilian needs a large irrigated land which was larger than Congo 26,5 times.
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants You should write at least 150 words 83
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developingand industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.953125 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78036717418 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4819675806 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244600465412 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115498865393 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698510828226 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146597938225 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766327023858 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.