the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
the charts show the amount of water which was used by agriculture, industrial and homes around the world at 1900 to 2000 and water which was used by brazil and democratic of <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Congo</span> only in 2000.
the most significant facts to emerge from the charts are that the agriculture had higher water use than two other sectors (industrial and domestic) the water consumption in brazil in was higher than that in Congo.
we can see that global water use by agriculture in 1900 was just over 500 <span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><sup>3</sup><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">, that amount was higher than </span>industrials<span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> and domestic. just around 100 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> and 150 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> </span>respectively<span style="font-size: 1.1em;">. after 1900 </span>the consumption of<span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> water for agriculture increased significantly to 3000 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> in 2000. in addition, the others </span>remain<span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> constant until 1940 then increased to around 1400 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> and 500 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif;">k</span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> each. </span><br>
regarding water consumption in, brazil in 2000 had higher number than Congo in three aspects. population of brazil and Congo were 176 million and 52 million respectively. the irigated land in brazil accounted for 26500 <span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", sans-serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">km</span><sup>2</sup><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">, 265 higher than that in </span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">Congo</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;">. hence, the amount of water consumed per person in brazil was greater with 359 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> and only 8 </span><span style="background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; font-size: 14.5pt; line-height: 22.2333px; font-family: "Lucida Bright", serif; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">m</span><span style="font-size: 14.52px; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; top: -0.5em;">3</span><span style="font-size: 1.1em;"> in </span>Congo<span style="font-size: 1.1em;">.</span><br><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the charts show the amount of water which w...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...36px;'>Congo only in 2000. the most significant facts to emerge from t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...l in was higher than that in Congo. we can see that global water use by agricu...
^^
Line 4, column 884, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...;font-size: 1.1em;'> and domestic. just around 100 ^^^^
Line 4, column 2645, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...n style='font-size: 1.1em;'>. after 1900 the consumption of ^^^^^
Line 4, column 3624, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...'font-size: 1.1em;'> in 2000. in addition, the others remain
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Population
...her number than Congo in three aspects. population of brazil and Congo were 176 million an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...76 million and 52 million respectively. the irigated land in brazil accounted for 2...
^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...n style='font-size: 1.1em;'>. hence, the amount of water consumed per perso...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, regarding, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 42.0 3.97073170732 1058% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 7197.0 965.302439024 746% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 672.0 196.424390244 342% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 10.7098214286 4.92477711251 217% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 5.09145979004 3.73543355544 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.91053339839 2.65546596893 260% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.21130952381 0.547539520022 39% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1693.8 283.868780488 597% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.5 1.45097560976 172% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 67.0 22.4926829268 298% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 621.351720043 43.030603864 1444% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 719.7 112.824112599 638% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 67.2 22.9334400587 293% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0155924727479 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467882077544 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665831880495 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845305742929 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793217209996 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 62.6 13.2329268293 473% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -72.67 61.2550243902 -119% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 26.7 6.51609756098 410% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 40.0 10.3012195122 388% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 46.02 11.4140731707 403% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 28.8 10.9970731707 262% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 11.0658536585 569% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.