The graph below compares in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates some similarities between Chinese and American fertility rates during the period from 1920 to 2000.
It is evident that the birth rates of both countries fluctuated considerably, with lowest during the 1940s and highest during the 1950s.
China's birth rates witnessed an increase from 10% to 15% over the period shown, then remained stable during 1940s. In the following year, the fertility rates of China hit a peak point at 20%, however fell suddenly for nearly 3 years. As a result, the Chinese's childbirth figure experienced a gradually decline around 5% until 2000s. The lowest number stood at just 2%.
Meanwhile, there was a fluctuation in the US birth rates over a period of 20 years. From 1937 to 1940, the childbirth rates fell dramatically to under 5%, a drop of almost 9%. After decreasing, the ratio of fertility in America reached a peak of 15%. Then went down little by little, just over 5% in 2000.
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examinations 84
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 80
- The graph below compares in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- The bar chart shows information about fiction book sales from 2006 to 2010 82
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1940s'.
Suggestion: during the 1940s
... the period shown, then remained stable during 1940s. In the following year, the fertility r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
... Chineses childbirth figure experienced a gradually decline around 5% until 2000s. The lowest numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94409937888 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6049070389 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639751552795 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6249897959 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231335050693 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792259849202 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753465695489 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146199261497 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673471332293 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.