The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the proportion of the changes in the birth in two different countries named USA and China from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, both the birth proportions in two nations decreased over the period. In addition, the birth rate in USA was higher than that of China.
In 1920, the proportion of the birth in USA accounted for 12%, 2% higher than that of China. The next 15 years, the birth rates in US and China increased slightly to 13% and 15% respectively. In 1945, both birth rates in US and China witnessed a downward trend to under 5%. However, there was a significant upward trend in US and China to reach a peak of 15% and 20% for each in 1950s.
During the year 1990s, while the figure for the birth in USA rose slightly around 7%, the birth proportion of China remained unchanged just around 3%. From 1995 to 2000, the figures for both the birth in two nation declined gradually and the birth rate in China dropped to a nair of around 2% in 2000.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt upward trend in US and China to reach a peak of 15% and 20% for each in 1950s....
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1950s'.
Suggestion: in the 1950s
...o reach a peak of 15% and 20% for each in 1950s. During the year 1990s, while the figu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
..., the figures for both the birth in two nation declined gradually and the birth rate i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43333333333 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3573892234 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0961422408 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25197418449 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1288178088 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670460597898 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180583104783 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401718188781 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.