The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph shows the variations in the birth ratios of two countries from 1920 to 2000. It is noticeable that the levels of birth decreased in both countries over the timeframe.
The USA’s rate stood at 11, a little higher than China. However, they both followed a similar trend, were fitful between 1920 and 1930. 1935 saw a different number from two countries, the USA’s rate is lower than another one. Next, this figure moderately fall during 1940 to reach a through of 5 in 1945, but then peaking at 15 in 1950. This proportion gradually dropped over the period to finish at approximately 7 in 2000.
In contrast, China saw a dramatic declined to 5 in 1940, a little bit higher than the USA, and remained stable at this rate during 1945. Next, this ratio reached a high of 20 in 1950 and collapsed significantly over the period to hit a low of 25 in 1980 and then fluctuating for the remainder of the period.
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- information in the graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...saw a dramatic declined to 5 in 1940, a little bit higher than the USA, and remained stabl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5748502994 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60526528812 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.119046607 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8888888889 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219459992125 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901818062157 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700581475278 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146191759296 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493664752021 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.