The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates the number of birth rates in China and the usa between 1920 and 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the birth rates in the usa was higher than in China especially after 1950 but the birth rate of both countries followed a similar trend.
Turning to the usa , starting at around 11 in 1920, however, there was a slight fluctuation in the figure from 1920 to 1930 and then decrease slowly over the over following 5 years. Next, the numbers of birth reached a low of about 4 procent percent in 1945, which was followed by a sudden increase at the end of the period. After that over the next 10 years, it dropped gradually to 13 % 1960, with the rate remaining stable at 13% in 1965.1965 to 1985 witnessed a significant decline in the figure, but it remained unchanged to 6 in 1990. Finally the remainder op of period recovered slightly with respect to(unsuitable term) China beginning at 10 in1920, after that there was a fluctuation between 1920 and 1935 in this. However, 1935 to 1940 saw a dramatic fall in the rate, leveling off at this rate for the following five years. After that it reached a high of 20%in 1950 in the figure. However over the next 30 years at 3 in 1980 which was the lowest of that those years, evening out at 13 in 1985 the figure recovered to 3 in the last year
- Birth rates in China and the USA 67
- when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 56
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- 1 11
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be seen that the birth rates in the usa was higher than in China especially afte...
^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d a similar trend. Turning to the usa , starting at around 11 in 1920, however...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... a similar trend. Turning to the usa , starting at around 11 in 1920, however,...
^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...but it remained unchanged to 6 in 1990. Finally the remainder op of period recovered sl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...this rate for the following five years. After that it reached a high of 20%in 1950 in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, then, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38114754098 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39208559655 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536885245902 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4207807872 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246869595474 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128062801072 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171052569335 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286403761216 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176945783633 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.