The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025

The line graph provides statistical data on how mich energy was produced and consumed by the citizens of the US between 1950 and 2000, and future estimates until 2025. The enegy units are mesured in quadrillions of BTU's.

It can be clearly seen from the graph that the energy consumption was greater that its production. However, both of them are expected to continue to rise until 2025 according to the chart.

Both categories of US consumption and production followed more or less the same trend. They both grew considerably to around 60 energy units in 1975 despite some fluctuations in the earlier given period. In contrast, there were mild variations during around 1980-1990 in the proportion of energy produced while the figure of consumption increased to 75 energy units after that trend.

Nevertheless, the amount of energy consumed is forecast to soar to 150 enregy units in 2025 afte growing to 100 energy units in 2000. Furthermore, there would be a slight increase in the share of production of energy to 75 energy units.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, while, in contrast, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99425287356 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72707659528 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4056507196 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255202325756 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103585366769 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454272266706 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145327187867 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0077126322117 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.