The line chart shows changes in energy consumption in the USA from 1980 to 2008, with projected consumption to 2030.
It is clear that total consumption of energy in the USA increased over the period shown, and that the highest energy expenditure was seen in Petrol and Oil.
In 1980, 35 quadrillion units of Petrol and Oil was consumed. Energy consumption from Natural Gas and Coal was lower, around 20 and 15 quadrillion respectively. The figures for Nuclear, Solar or Wind and Hydropower was under 5 quadrillion. By 2008, expenditure of energy came from Petrol and Oil had risen to over 40 quadrillion, while the figures for Natural Gas and Coal had increased gradually to 22 quadrillion. Consumption of energy in Nuclear, Solar or wind and Hydropower sector had remained at a similar level.
From 2008 to 2030, Petrol and Oil sector is expected to see a quick jump in energy consumption, at over 45 quadrillion in 2030. Similarly, energy expenditure in Coal sector is going to experience a rapid rise to over 25 quadrillion, while the figures for the other 4 sectors remain stable.
- The diagrams below show some principles of house design for cool and for warm climates 82
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92972972973 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90671120876 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491891891892 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6909010822 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158927477744 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857628121196 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866065243253 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141897203709 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969835598164 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.