The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph represents data given in a report of 2008 which shows the usage of 6 types of energy in the USA from the year 1980 until 2030 along with future estimations.
Overall, the demand of petrol and oil is significant and is forecasted to rise with some fluctuations. Furthermore, consumption of all energy types are projected to rise except the hydropower one.
As the graph shows, the usage of petroleum products started at 35 quadrillion units (3q) in 1980 since then it has rose steadily with some fluctuations. This figure is projected to increase gradually to just over 45q in the next 10 years. Similarly, around 16 of coal energy was used in 1980 which has been estimated to increase to a high of 30q in 2030. In terms of hydropower energy, it was least consumed in the USA and the graph indicated that its usage will be limited to around 3q in the future.
On the other hand, the consumption of natural energy started at the figure of 30q in the past followed by a decrease to around 16q until 1985. By contrast, this figure experienced considerable growth to just below 25q in the year 2015 after which it will remain constant until 2030. With regard to nuclear and solar energy, their usage was only around 4q in 1980 and has been forecasted to rise slightly to around 7q and 51 respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62393162393 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65344354682 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7387359462 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218086889102 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829791664995 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696344278718 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145440175588 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787079365743 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.