The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the general consumption of American energy by six fuels from 1980 to 2030.
In general, it is can see from the graph shows that uses of petrol and coil, coal increase about 10 quadrillion units over 50 years, while other fuels rise slightly around 5 quadrillion units.
In 1980, petrol and oil occupied the highest proportion of consumption energy in the USA staying at 35 quadrillion units but it fluctuated from about 30 to 35 quadrillion units during the next 15 years, then it had been keeping increasing since the year 1995. It has predicted that it will reach approximately 50 quadrillion units in 2030.
On the other hands, uses of coal and natural gas stay the middle level on the whole, which occupied nearly 16 and exactly 20 quadrillion units respectively in 1980. Although, both of these consumption fuels had been rising smoothly and reached about 25 quadrillion units. However, coal fuel has predicted that it will rise to approximately 30 quadrillion units in 2030 while natural gas will stay remains as the same level in this period.
Finally, uses of nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower were the lowest, which are the same units of being about 4 quadrillions in 1980. It has predicted that hydropower will stay remain the level over 50 years while both nuclear and solar/wind will rise but it is not significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | Moustafa Nofale | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | wardiati | 61 | view |
- As languages such as English, Spinish and Mandarin become more widely spoken , there is a fear that many minority languages may die out. Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages.What is your view of this practice? 61
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Convinience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, then, while, in general, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92173913043 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72036359184 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508695652174 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6677419243 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10846622198 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591656082304 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055443291465 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851542383436 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059407952477 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.