The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart provides information about the 2008 report of The united States’ energy used (in quadrillion units) from 1980 and it is projecting in 2030. Overall, there was an upward trend in the figure of energy used in the period, and it predicts that the figure of petrol and oil will remain the highest at the end of the period.
In 1980, the share of petrol and oil was the biggest and it stood of around 35 followed by a moderate fluctuation in the next fifteen years. After that, the figure increased gradually to more than 40 in 2019, then it projects to increase by 50 in 2030.
Natural gas and coal began at an almost similar figure, about 20 and 16 respectively. After which, the number of natural gas fluctuated, while the coal experienced an increase and surpassed the natural gas in 1990 (at around 17). Then, the coal incline gradually and will reach just below 30 in 2030. Natural gas, however, experienced fluctuation for more than 35 years and increased to similar that of coal in 2013 then, will end-up the period just above 20.
The figures for remaining energy sources shared similar numbers in 1980 (approximately 3). While Nuclear and Solar/wind will finish the period at 6 and 5, the number of Hydropower will not change in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | Moustafa Nofale | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | wardiati | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held the in 1999. 61
- Some people feel that boarding school (where students live at the school during the term) are excellent option for children, while other people disagree. Consider both side of the debate and reach a conclusion. 78
- People Participate in IELTS Programs in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 67
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 61
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71621621622 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53395494917 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2474816592 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122735566859 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554865004641 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810932129477 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819842511949 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662966406207 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.