he given line graph illustrates the data from a report in 2008 regarding energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with predictions until 2030.
Overall, the fossil fuels have shown increases in consumption since the start of the period, with expectations of more reliance on these fuel sources. Cleaner sources of energy have accounted for
considerable less consumption with predictions for a similar trend.
Fossil fuels, such as coal, Natural gas, Petrol and oil, they have seen steady increases in energy consumption in 1980. Petrol and oil had started with 35 quadrillion units and fluctuated till 2000, at which they rose steadily with a prediction of over 45 quadrillion units. Additionally, Coal also followed the similar trend. It is estimated to reach 30 quadrillion units by 2030. Natural gas usage demonstrated fluctuations and is set to level off at around 24 quadrillion units from 2020 onwards.
In stark contrast, cleaner energy fuel sources all began with under 5 quadrillion units and showed declines in their use, with the exception of Nuclear, which climbed up to 6 quadrillion units from 2005.
Solar/Wind power followed a similar trend and are predicted to continue steadily, after showing slight increase after the lowest point in 1995. Hydropower has remained the lowest of the three and is predicted to relatively remain unchanged until 2030.
- The bar charts show education data related to young adults aged 15 years in 10 different countries in 2015 The first chart shows in which countries adolescents do the most homework in terms of hours per week The second chart shows the nations that scored 83
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 56
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he given line graph illustrates the data f...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'gave'?
Suggestion: gave
he given line graph illustrates the data from a ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ner sources of energy have accounted for considerable less consumption with predi...
^^^
Line 8, column 123, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...units and showed declines in their use, with the exception of Nuclear, which climbed up to 6 quadrill...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29680365297 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82360931113 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7622155139 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182430409374 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738913135028 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985892287431 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114707170862 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117154231602 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.