The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows information from a 2008 report on the amount of energy consumed by different fuel types in the USA from 1980 to 2030.
It is clear that the consumption of all sources is predicted to increase between 1980 and 2030. Besides, petrol and oil were always the most consumed energy sources.
In 1980, Petrol and Oil were consumed the most with 35 quadrillion units, then the figure rose to approximately 40 quadrillion units in the year 2008, and this is set to reach nearly 50 quadrillion units in 2030. Natural gas and coal came in second and third in 1980 with around 20 quadrillion units and 16 quadrillion units respectively. However, Coal overtook natural gas in 1990, and with just over 30 quadrillion units, this kind of energy is set to be the second most used fuel in 2030. It is predicted that natural gas will level off at about 25 quadrillion units .
There was a variation in annual energy consumption for three kinds of sources, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower. In 1980, the figures for nuclear and renewable energies stood at around 4 quadrillion units and fluctuated up until 2008. It is speculated that nuclear energy will reach 10 quadrillion by 2030, and solar/wind will rise slightly around 5 quadrillion units. Moreover, Hydropower is predicted to drop and then remain constant at approximately 2 quadrillion units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 73
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l types in the USA from 1980 to 2030. It is clear that the consumption of all ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays the most consumed energy sources. In 1980, Petrol and Oil were consumed th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... level off at about 25 quadrillion units . There was a variation in annual en...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...el off at about 25 quadrillion units . There was a variation in annual energy c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82614743473 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.957871929 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177956039863 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809928393572 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928978527136 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152832858205 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119747205987 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.