The chart below shows the energy (million units) generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000.
The chart gives information about wind energy generation in four different countries between 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that all countries increased in energy production except Germany in the last given year. The US was by far the most produced wind energy in both years.
In 1985, the US produced around 120 million units, double that of Germany, and then the figure rose to approximately 140 million units in the year 2000. By contrast, Germany’s trend was opposite to the US. Germany produced under 60 million units in 1985, and dropped away around 50 million units in 2000.
India and Denmark produced less wind energy than the other two countries. In 1985, the wind energy production in India increased significantly 30 million units, and nearly equaled Germany in 2000 with around 40 million units. Denmark had the same upward trend, rising to 20 million units in 2000, half that of Germany. Despite the increase in wind energy production in Denmark, this country was still the least productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0119047619 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47822146562 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 127.690721649 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 290.88556701 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1666488413 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 16.8248392259 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 4.34317383033 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441254600489 0.216113520407 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175626636996 0.0766984524023 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136751395312 0.0603063233224 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294068970299 0.12726935374 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14638404692 0.0580467560999 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 41.2886597938 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.