The line graph illustrates how many quadrillion units of petrol are consumped to produce energy in the US from the past 1980 to the prospect of 2030.
Regarding the fossil fuels group such as nuclear, solar / wind or hydropower, there would be a upward trend in the amount of consumption but in a slight scale. Among that, the energy consumption by nuclear have performed a remarkable increase whereas that by hydropower would experience a minor drop.
Another noticable point is that the figure of renewable energy seems to stand out. To be more specific, petrol and oil own the highest quadrillion units which is around ten times higher than the average figure of the remaining group. It is expected to reach approximately 50 quadrillion units in 2013. Meanwhile, following at the second place is coal whose performance is pretty amazing when the number is predicted to rise to 25 quadrillion units. Even though natural gas had a tremendous start,
it would suffer from a fluctuation before ending at the third place at about 25 quadrillion units.
In conclusion, the US energy consumptions by six types of fuel are all on the increase. Also, renewable energy figures seem to outweigh that of nuclear line.
- Today, anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society? 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ar / wind or hydropower, there would be a upward trend in the amount of consumpti...
^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough natural gas had a tremendous start, it would suffer from a fluctuation befor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, third, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79813522652 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645320197044 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2237491157 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909927237805 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365809730293 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359725429365 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595555647262 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037227217996 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.