The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 and
with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The line graph, which is from 2008 survey, outlines the usage of energy in the United States since 1980 and also the projections until 2030.
Overall, the trends in energy consumption have remained pretty consistent, and are expected to do so in the future. Petrol and oil, coal and natural gas are expected to remain the top three types of fuel s consumed, whereas nuclear, solar/wind and hydro-power will remain in the bottom tier.
In the 1980, production of energy from petrol and oil was 35 quadrillion units, which showed fluctuation throughout next decade and a half until 1995, after which it has been on a constant rise and is predicted to reach about 50 quadrillion units by 2030. The natural gas and coal were second and third most used fuel resource in the 1980, but they also showed fluctuation along with steady rise in consumption. Hence, in the future, the coal is supposed to overtake natural gas with about 28 quadrillion units consumption, compared to 20 quadrillion of gas.
The sustainable fuels were always the least preferred, as they were below 5 quadrillion units consumption mark in 1980 and throughout the next few decades. Similarly, they are expected to remain the least used method until 2030, with hydro-power consumption being a mere 2.5 quadrillion units, approximately.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Something something fuck you I'm tired of writing topics oh and give your opinion. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, second, similarly, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03686635945 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77828594152 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557603686636 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6714930537 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197035839811 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958663194685 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074622612426 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139196130597 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823449320378 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.