The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates a comparison of the number of cars per household in Great Britain between 1971 and 2007
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of families owning one car is the biggest. There was an increase in the proportion of households having two cars while the opposite was true for households without cars.
In 1971, almost half of the British families had no regular use of a car. There was a slightly smaller portion of house owners having one car, with about 44%. Meanwhile, only a few households owned more than one car, with 7% had two cars compared to just around 2% had the ownership of three cars or more.
Over the 36-year period, there were significant changes in the proportion of people without cars and using two cars. The figure for two car users experienced a dramatic increase to 26%, whereas the percentage of the household having no car dropped to 25%. At the same time, the one-car household was the most common type, and its figure nearly stayed the same during the period. Similarly, little change was seen in the figure for the ownership of three or more cars, which only rose to approximately 5%, the lowest proportion among four types.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The digram below shows the plan for rebuilding shopping center in central town The maps below show the layout of a shopping mall before level 1 and after level 2 the construction 77
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72946859903 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48612570532 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0728345521 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197333517643 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879845278284 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622059403053 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145056079674 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822062657631 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.