The diagram provides data on the age groups attending the cinema in Australia in the range of two decades starting in 1990. There are four different age groups, from 14-year-olds to 50 and above.
Looking into the graph, it is noticeable that the cinema is packed mostly with youngsters of 14 up to 24-year-olds. Beginning at 90% and through fluctuation, this status stayed constant for twenty years. In contrast, the oldest group remained to be the group with the least interest in cinema although there was a quite significant rise over the two decades.
The attendance percentage of the group of 35 to 49-year-olds was projected to increase from 60% in 1990 to 85% in 2010. On the other hand, the attendance percentage of the 25 to 34-year-olds age group had a gradual increase from 1990 to 2000. However, starting then, its percentage was projected to go downhill in 2010.
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 69
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below gives information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1990 and the present, with projections to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8435111316 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3150978528 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139135787593 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627595165333 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446885175808 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916885476619 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013512587191 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.