Given is the bar chart delineating the daily consumption of salt of six separate age groups in the USA in the year 2000.
Perceptibly, males of all age groups consumed a higher amount of salt than that of females. Furthermore, people aged 20 to 39 by far had the highest salt intake in the reported year. When it comes to the daily intake of salt in women, children under the age of 6 absorbed approximately 1200 milligrams of salt, while the oldest age group ate roughly 2500 milligrams worth of salt in their meals, which met the recommended adult sodium intake. Conversely, there was an insignificant disproportion in the salt absorption between the age group of 6 to 11 and the 40 to 60-year-olds, all of which breached the advised salt intake with vaguely 2800 to 2900 milligrams of salt. In terms of male’s salt consumption on a daily basis, the youngest age group registered 500 milligrams more than that of females. The following age groups were analogous to the swelling trend, with 3500 milligrams and 4300 milligrams for the 6 to 11-year-olds and the age group of 12 to 20 in sequence, followed by the alarming peak of salt intake in male adults aged from 20 to 39 with approximately 4400 milligrams. Men in the age group of 40 to 60 achieved a salt intake of 4000 milligrams whereas the over-60s receded to the same amount of that in the age group of 6 to 12 year olds.
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 70
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56224899598 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82097570085 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1187172307 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172872237463 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10441379299 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500424312531 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174473668986 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316632970825 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.