The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph illustrating the amounts of CO2 emitted by each person in four countries, namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal over a period 40 years, starting in 1967.
It is conspicuous that each Swedish or UK person released less CO2 over the period researched while the opposite was true for CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal showed a rise. Furthermore, of all the nations, citizens in the UK were responsible for the largest amount of CO2 released all the time.
Take the first-year data, around 11 tonnes of CO2 was produced by a UK citizen, followed by 9 tonnes in Sweden. In the interim, each Italian discharged over 4 tonnes which was approximately threefold higher than that of a Portuguese.
From that period onwards, the average quantity of CO2 released in the UK shrank gradually to under 9 tonnes while the figure for Sweden, after a 1-tonne climb in the first decade then went slump moderately to well under 6 tonnes in 2007. In contrast, more CO2 was produced by each person in Italy whose figure surged to roughly 8 tonnes in 2007, compared with an equally significant soar to roughly 6 tonnes in Portugal.
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65563551716 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3227093204 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172164648549 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853838636131 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715850932036 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116737131259 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066857913249 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.