The graph below gives information about the hours spent weekly on home activities by schoolchildren aged 10-11.
This graph demonstrates information about expending time of schoolchildren aged 10-11 on various home activities such as TV and computer over an 8-year period. In general,the hours on watching TV decreased noticeably, while there was a gradual increase in playing computer by now. It can be seen that the figures which are describing TV activity remained at 21 hours a week between 2000 and 2003. After that, the trend for TV dropped to 15 hours in 2004, however, it had changed over the years, and there had been fluctuations in numbers till the present time.
According to the details of computer activities, it is clearly known that the numbers showed only positive figures over the period.
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately. 73
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past. Some people argue that this is because competition for job is greater that it used to be. Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph below gives information about the hours spent weekly on home activities by schoolchildren aged 10-11. 56
- The graph below shows how much time schoolchildren aged 10-11 years old spend per week for different home activities. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...mputer over an 8-year period. In general,the hours on watching TV decreased noticeab...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 580.0 965.302439024 60% => OK
No of words: 116.0 196.424390244 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.28181803491 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78994872928 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.724137931034 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 167.4 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.8353220291 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22466988103 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108279174225 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132305792184 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128224480032 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128224480032 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.