The graph below gives information about the sales of five types of vehicles in Country A from 1980 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about the sales of five types of vehicles in Country A from 1980 to 2010

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the sales of five various transports categories in Country A between 1980 and 2010.

It is clear that there was an upward trend in the number of cars under 1.8 litres (small cars) as opposed to that of cars over 1.8 litres (big cars) and station wagons in 30 years. commercial vans and motorbikes saw a fluctuation in sales figures.

In 1980, around 1.8 million of small cars were sold, while that figures for big cars and station wagons were approximately 2.75 million and 2.5 million respectively. In two decades later, the sales figure for small cars overtook that number of big cars and station wagons at the point of about 2.5 million and was by far the most widespread popular in 2000, with roughly 3.75 million. Similarly, the sales of big cars and station wagons decreased significantly and reached at approximately the same point of 1.5 million. From 2000 to 2010, the sales of small cars remained unchanged, while that of big cars and station wagons continuously went up under 1.5 million.

In 1980, commercial vans and motorbikes were around 0.4 and 0.5 million respectively. After that, it saw a fluctuation in the range of 0.4 and 0.5 million. In the final period, that number reached its same point of about 0.45 million.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-27 teobatman00 82 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Commercial
...ig cars and station wagons in 30 years. commercial vans and motorbikes saw a fluctuation i...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84403669725 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5910894686 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9493615893 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712783417181 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423546516787 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474477125433 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688307163627 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631220810906 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.