The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on the research between 1980 and 2008
The line graph illustrates how much is the governments’ expenditure on research in five fields period from 1980 to 2008
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the U. S spent the largest money for Health. Conversely, the least amount of money was spent on the research General Science
In 1980, around $8 billion was used for Health, compared to about $3 of General Science. In the next 4 years, the expense for Health experienced a slight decrease, while the cost of General Science continual remained around $3 billion. Since 1984, the figures for Health skyrocketed like a rocket and reached a peak of nearly 23 billion in 2004. Despite declining back to approximately 18 billion in 2008. However, it still was the highest. In the same time, the amount of money added to General Science increased and kept stable at 5 billion from 2000 to 2008.
The quantity of money was spent on research into Energy, Space and the Other at about 5 billion, 6 billion and 7.5 billion, respectively. Surprisingly, the figures for three indexes similar to at 5 billion in 1984. Meanwhile, the expenditure on Energy and Space gradually went up at 7.5 billion and approximately 10 billion in 2008. Despite the expense's Other coming back to its original level in 2000 but finally, it dropped to 5 billion in 2008
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Education for young people is important in many countries However some people think that the government should spend more money on education in adult populations who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachears in 2009 89
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The charts indicate the proportion of money that people in France, Germany and Englandspent on food and other products in 1998 and 2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...search General Science In 1980, around billion was used for Health, compared to...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n was used for Health, compared to about of General Science. In the next 4 years,...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eneral Science continual remained around billion. Since 1984, the figures for Hea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89686098655 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80255066915 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533632286996 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3480192553 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131042082057 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506204264666 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671474874285 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11021865484 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777313584401 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.