The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates a 2008 report about the amount of four different fuel sources used in America since 1980 with projections through 2030.

Overall, there was a significant increase in most of the consumption of energy but hydro power. It was also noticeable that petrol and oil was consumed mostly while the opposite was true for hydro power.

In the starting year, petrol and oil and coal began as the two most popular energies, still went up between 1985 and 2015. Both of them are expected to keep rising considerably in the next 15 years. On the other hand, natural gas, despite experiencing a gradual peak of about 5% up to 2015, tend to flatten out at around 25%.

Besides, nuclear and solar/wind, which had a slight increase, are projected to remain stabled from 2015 to 2015 before growing a little bit in 2030. According to the data, hydro power, the least-used at the beginning, is likely to level off over the period between 2015 and 2030 after fluctuating in the first 30 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a projection' or simply 'projections'?
Suggestion: a projection; projections
...o power used by American from 1980 with a projections until 2030. Overall, the expenditur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
...ed much. To be specific, three kinds of these energy had the same figure in 1980 and the con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tion of nuclear is likely to climb up a little bit over 5 quadrillion at the end of the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 277, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('minimally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('oscillation') instead of another adjective.
...the end of the period and there will be a minimally oscillation of solar/wind and hydro power
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78918918919 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71028126649 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5975144934 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137539977527 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669946957753 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835079244383 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101932365583 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930681004757 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.