The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts reveal the data of the proportion of using five different means of transport to travel to one university in a 5-year period from 2004.
Overall, it is clear that among all the mentioned vehicles, car and bus - the two most prevalent means - were widely used. Meanwhile, citizens were not keen on traveling by train and on foot.
In 2004, more than a half of people drove cars to school. Therefore, automobiles ranked the highest in the number of people using, followed by it were buses which was only slightly lower than cars , at 33% occupied the second highest position. In the next 5 years, an opposite pattern occurred with these 2 figures. In detail, the number of car users decreased significantly to 28% , while a rise of more than 10% was seen in the proportion of those who traveled by bus
Moreover there were still a few people not choosing car or bus. Instead, cycling, walking and going by train were their means of transport. Just about 3% and 4% citizens preferred to go to university by train and walking respectively. These numbers finally slightly climbed up to 4 and 6% . However, they were still the least common means of transport used. In addition, only 9% of commuters enjoyed riding a bike, which was about three times the percentage of train passengers. In the final year. the rate of bike riders also increased by 7%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The maps below show the future plan about the Biology School in particular university 61
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... which was only slightly lower than cars , at 33% occupied the second highest posi...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...car users decreased significantly to 28% , while a rise of more than 10% was seen ...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of those who traveled by bus Moreover there were still a few people n...
^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... finally slightly climbed up to 4 and 6% . However, they were still the least comm...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...of train passengers. In the final year. the rate of bike riders also increased by 7...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5732244077 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.818485263 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1428571429 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977545083994 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331725382218 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460115395972 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730840608979 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607584465289 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... which was only slightly lower than cars , at 33% occupied the second highest posi...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...car users decreased significantly to 28% , while a rise of more than 10% was seen ...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of those who traveled by bus Moreover there were still a few people n...
^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... finally slightly climbed up to 4 and 6% . However, they were still the least comm...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...of train passengers. In the final year. the rate of bike riders also increased by 7...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5732244077 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.818485263 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1428571429 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977545083994 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331725382218 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460115395972 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730840608979 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607584465289 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.