The graph below gives information on the number of subscribers paying to use fixed telephone lines and mobile cell phone networks in Africa between 1994 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information on the number of subscribers paying to use fixed telephone lines and mobile/cell phone networks in Africa between 1994 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph depicts the figure of individuals who subscribed and paid to utilize fixed telephone lines and mobile phone system over a course of 10 years starting from 1994.

As can be seen from the picture, it is clearly evident that the quantity of citizens who chose to use mobile phone networks witnessed a rapid development, whereas the number of inhabitants choosing to utilize fixed telephone lines saw a steady increase over the provided timescale.

First and for most, as regards the quantity of people using cell phone system, in 1994, there was no one deciding to use this type of networks. After that, it dramatically climbed from the lowest point to its zenith among the two given services throughout the surveyed duration. In the last provided year, it registered almost 10 people per 100 habitants.

The remaining service, on the other hand, remained stable over the provided timescale, in the first surveyed year, the number of citizens who chose this kind of service stood at roughly 2 out of inhabitants. The figure continued to increase progressively until reaching 3 people per 100 inhabitants.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-02 Lion 95 view
Essays by user Lion :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas, as regards, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06989247312 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69199727837 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618279569892 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5373394115 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167738632992 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705135219645 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799576531552 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111550949165 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073079291723 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.