The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030
The line graph presents the expenditure of the five energy sources such as oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear and solar from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, there is an upward trend in the use of the energy from these sources. In addition, the number of oil used is the highest in Australia compared to the others, while some sources of renewable energy such as nuclear and solar are expended uncommonly.
In 1980, oil consumption in energy was approximately 35 billion units. By 2010, it increases by roughly 10 billion units and reaches a peak of 45 billion units. Over a next twenty-year period, it is forecasted to rise moderately to 50 billion units.
For coal and natural gas, starting at about 20 and 15 billion units respectively in 1980. By 2010, they are expended about 25 billion units. The expenditure of coal is projected to increase by 10 billion units whereas for natural gas, it will just by 5 billion units in 2030.
The minor energy sources were nuclear and solar. From 1980 to 2010, the consumption of the both rose slightly from about 4 billion unit to roughly 7 billion units. They are expected to rise relatively slightly to about 10 billion unit by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | phmixu27 | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | mimeomahong | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
- The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
- Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that students will learn better when they study own.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- These days, people have little knowledge about the natural world. What can be the causes? And How can tackle this problem? 73
- The graphs below show a comparison of the weekly expenses in the UK and the US, in 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, as for, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72195121951 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55963263277 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1949773987 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206503576137 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089758841084 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050206911849 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132324272109 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046356211514 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.