The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The graph illustrates the ratio of money expended for books in 4 different countries over the period from 1005 and 2005. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there was an upward trend on spending money on books in Germany, France, Italy, and Austria from 1995 to 2005.
According to the graph, Germany and Austria’s expenditure on books rose slightly to 10 millions dollars, from 80 to 90 millions dollars in Germany and from 30 to 40 million dollars in Austria respectively. However, it fluctuated slightly in Germany from 90 to approximately 85 million dollars between 1999 and 2003. Despite this, spending money on books in Germany experienced a rise from 2003 to 2005 and ended at around 95 million dollars. Regarding Austria, the amount of money spent on books remained stable over the 2-year period from 1999 to 2001. In spite of that, in Austria, it climbed sharply from 2001 to 2005, and finished at just over 70 million dollars.
On the other hand, in 1995, money spent on books in France and Italy was almost at the same level, with 50 and 55 million dollars respectively. Then, after a slight fluctuation of Italy from 1995 to 1999, there was an upward trend on buying books in Italy, which ended at about 62 million dollars. For instance, the situation in France rose gradually from 55 to 75 million dollars over the decade.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, then, for instance, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77253218884 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52118069871 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502145922747 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0334813167 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309646591228 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139220407236 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608526869802 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217964629761 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245395659009 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, then, for instance, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77253218884 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52118069871 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502145922747 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0334813167 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309646591228 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139220407236 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608526869802 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217964629761 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245395659009 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.