The bar graph illustrates the cost utilized by the UK to clean different types of energy the year between 2008 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the investment had been grown from the beginning till the end, while in every year among the energies for cleaning the wind energy costs the most and smart-energy had the least.
To begin with the first four consecutive years, in this period most of the total money was used to clean the air and in 2009 and 2010 it went over 5 billion pounds, though, in 2011, the least amount of money was used on the wind sector. While a small portion was given to clean smart technologies but up to 2009, no money was invested in solar energy. In 2011 the UK authorities gave most of the money to clean others and solar power in total it approximately closed to 5 billion.
In the next four years, the total cost was increased gradually, while in 2012 and 2013 there was no change in the case of solar energy but increase in 2014 and went near to 5 billion. The investment in smart technology and others also upgraded but not significantly as wind. In 2015 almost 10 billion was used to clean wind energy.
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 11
- The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in 3 areas of a city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The illustrations shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42325581395 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34411221737 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1435782108 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169443702751 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853418796237 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647062549168 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130149463137 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640077787436 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.