Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree

Technology has flourished in every sphere of our life and changes the use of different materials. Due to the advent of technology people can get their hard copy books online easily and also up-to-date information. Nowadays the number of online readers is increasing day by day, hopefully, in the future, it will continue. From my perspective, I can say in the coming time's online books and news feeds will replace the hard copy.

On the one hand, the availability of the internet has changed the world. We can get information from the farthest corner of the world. Many big printed news companies create their online machine, even the university library so that people can easily find out their necessary topics whenever they want. For example, in the UK most of the universities have their online library, as a consequence, virtual attendance is increasing day by day rather than physical. In addition, apps, different software, and online portals give 24 hours live news updates and notifications to the people, as a result, more men and women use it to get more information rapidly. Due to the accessibility soon e-books will take over globally.

On the other hand, in recent times people are more concerned about climate change. For printed newspapers and magazines millions of green trees are being cut down daily, therefore deforestation is happening and people have to face many climate-related difficulties. Thousands of articles are written every year against this cutting down of trees. So it partially influences the number of networked readers.

In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, it is clear that, in the future, all hard copies will be replaced by online copies.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08960573477 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83374080892 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7734572036 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10327073384 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325481981667 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323787481996 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654498410738 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317484214576 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.