The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years
The line chart provides the data on how much rubbish is was produced from three organizations from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the companies A and B experienced a decrease decreasing trend in waste production while the amounts of waste produced by company C increased over the assessed period. At the beginning of the period, the waste materials of company A was the highest but the waste output of company C was the greatest by the end of the period.
Looking first at the commencing of the period, the biggest number went to the waste output of company A, with its figure being 12 tonnes. Followed by the waste production of companies A and B, with their respective quantities being 7 and 4 tonnes . From 2000 to 2005, the companies B and C witnessed a significant increase in turn to 11 and 6 tonnes of waste while it was 2 tonnes which the amount of waste produced company A decreased .
Turning to the finishing of the period, the company C experienced a dramatically growth to 11 tonnes which overtook company A and C to vie to first rank while the companies A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste.
- The bar graph below shows amount of carbon emissions in different countries during different years 73
- The table below shows the amount of waste that proceduced in six countries in the years 1980 1990 and 2000
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies a over a period of 15 years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...t provides the data on how much rubbish is was produced from three organizations f...
^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rovides the data on how much rubbish is was produced from three organizations from ...
^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the waste production of companies A and B, with their respective quantities bein...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...spective quantities being 7 and 4 tonnes . From 2000 to 2005, the companies B and ...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... From 2000 to 2005, the companies B and C witnessed a significant increase in tu...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a significant increase in turn to 11 and 6 tonnes of waste while it was 2 tonnes ...
^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of waste produced company A decreased . Turning to the finishing of the perio...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t of waste produced company A decreased . Turning to the finishing of the period...
^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...f the period, the company C experienced a dramatically growth to 11 tonnes which overtook company A a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the companies A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste.
^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es A and B fell considerably in turn to 8 and 3 tonnes of waste.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49519230769 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78341785688 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466346153846 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2859500229 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322069995425 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166657242711 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802517947728 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192472499746 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106319861003 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.