The line graph compares the volume of waste of three companies between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, there was a significant increase in the proportion of waste production of company C. A reverse pattern was seen towards company A and B in the same period.
In 2000, the amounts of waste produced of A gained 12 tonnes, which was 4 tonnes higher than that of the second rank, company B. Over a course of 15 years, the former decreased significantly, ending at nearly 9 tonnes in 2015. In contrast, the latter increased slightly and reached a peak of 10 tonnes before it plunged to its rock bottom at 3 tonnes.
From 2000 to 2015, company C was seen the most dramatic changes in its waste production. Although it was the lowest number of waste output, at 4 tonnes in 2000, there was a remarkable increase to 10 tonnes and took a lead at the end of the survey.
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- An increase in production of consumer goods result in damage of the natural environment . What are the reasons and possible solutions. 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts rock bottom at 3 tonnes. From 2000 to 2015, company C was seen the most dra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50955414013 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56663399125 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8933077177 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217682352545 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105929280335 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679791476712 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147872523427 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550645845143 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.