The line graph illustrates the annual vacationer spend on tourist to New Zealand from five different destinations such as Australia, the USA, UK, Japan, and China. The graph shows the expenditure for the years 1996 to 2014.
In the beginning, both countries have the lowest amount of spend which is 1000$ below in 1996. In 1998, there were just a few changes. The record of the UK became lower from the year 1998 to 2002. However, other countries just keep increasing. But in the year 2004 to 2008, the UK was improving for the past 3 years.
On the other hand, China was the destination that has the lowest record of expenditure. However, from 1996 to 2014, China showed a massive increased. Among all the countries, Australia was the destination that has a consistent increase from 1996 to 2006.
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1000'.
Suggestion: $1000
...ave the lowest amount of spend which is 1000$ below in 1996. In 1998, there were just...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 667.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79856115108 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60548882555 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2846904609 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220486375594 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870717819477 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790114934824 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157202482762 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845798268951 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.