The line graph illustrates the annual vacationer spend on tourist to New Zealand from five different destinations such as Australia, the USA, UK, Japan, and China. The graph shows the expenditure for the years 1996 to 2014.
In the beginning, both countries have the lowest amount of spend which is 1000$ below in 1996. In 1998, there were just a few changes. The record of the UK became lower from the year 1998 to 2002. However, other countries just keep increasing. But in the year 2004 to 2008, the UK was improving for the past 3 years.
On the other hand, China was the destination that has the lowest record of expenditure. However, from 1996 to 2014, China showed a massive increased. Among all the countries, Australia was the destination that has a consistent increase from 1996 to 2006.
Overall, all the mention tourist spot countries have a massive increase from 1993 to 2014.
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1000'.
Suggestion: $1000
...ave the lowest amount of spend which is 1000$ below in 1996. In 1998, there were just...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83766233766 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58380368662 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.853041169 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.7272727273 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236779011614 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901389604126 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759563243127 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148104548337 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749241454448 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.