The given line graph illustrates the average CO2 emissions on average per person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while the remaining two experienced a downward trend.
In 1967, the CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal were nearly 4.5 metric tonnes and 1 metric tonnes respectively. The CO2 emissions of Italy was increased sharply throughout the period and remains constant from 1997 to 2007. Furthermore, it exceeds the amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden in 1990 and reached almost 7.5 metric tonnes at the end of the period.In the mean time, the CO2 emissions in the Portugal grew to 3 metric tonnes in 1997 and experienced a rapid surge to more than 5 metric tonnes and continued with slightly increase to 5.2 metric tonnes in 2007.
The amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden reached its peak at 10.5 metric tonnes in 1997 and began from 9 metric tonnes in 1967 and declined to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. The CO2 emissions of UK(11 metric tonnes) was the highest among these four countries. However, it dramatically declined to 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In conclusion, it is clear that the UK produced the largest amount of gas while Sweden and Portugal were jointly the lowest.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1 PIE CHARTS 66
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1: PIE CHARTS 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent countries from 1967 to 2007. The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal show...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... metric tonnes at the end of the period.In the mean time, the CO2 emissions in the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80357142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56869894805 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459821428571 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1253028132 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198113464443 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110406462012 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626580764185 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141924423711 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085823865503 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.