The two piecharts illustrate how energy is produced from different types of fuel percentage wise in years 2007 and 2017. In both charts, at the beginning of the period, renewbies produced the least energy while natural gas was the most significant energy generated by fuel.
First of all, Natural gas accounted for 38.8% of energy generation in 2007 and this figure experienced a more than half energy generation which gradually rose to 54.4% in 2017. Similarly, nuclear produced 11.9% of energy generation in 2007 shows a slighty growth of 4% in 2017.
Coal which comprised 29.3% of energy generation in 2007,fell to almost a quarter of energy generation in 2017. At the beginning of the period, oil and renewbies made up 6.7% and 2.1% , and both fell to about 1 percent in 2017. Subsequently, there was other fuel energy which produced 11.1% in 2007 shows a considerable decrease of 3.4% in 2017.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1: PIE CHARTS 11
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1 PIE CHARTS 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... oil and renewbies made up 6.7% and 2.1% , and both fell to about 1 percent in 201...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 937.175257732 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 206.0 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70574026339 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 127.690721649 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.890781836 44.8134815571 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 8.37731958763 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.