The graph shows the average CO2 each person emits in four different countries: the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal over a 40- year period beginning in 1967. From the chart we can clearly see that Sweden and the UK have had a general downward trend. In Sweden, however, between the years 1967 and 1977 it did increase slightly from a little over 8 metric tonnes to over 10 metric tonnes. The Swedish decline was considerably more than that of the UK and actually nearly halved its output with the figure in 2007 showing a little under 6 metric tonnes. Both Italy and Portugal, steadily increased the emissions, with Portugal showing the greatest rise from a little under 2 metric tonnes in 1967, to nearly 6 metric tonnes by 2007. In summary, we can see that the overall amount of emissions recorded in 1967 is less than those of 2007.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Mor 50
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the adva 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 685.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59731543624 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2994585388 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.304951685 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24916043633 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122027465691 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918970386739 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24916043633 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.